Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37654669›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

The effects of COVID-19 on cognitive performance in a community-based cohort: a COVID symptom study biobank prospective cohort study.

Nathan J Cheetham, Rose Penfold, Valentina Giunchiglia, Vicky Bowyer, Carole H Sudre, Liane S Canas, Jie Deng, Benjamin Murray, Eric Kerfoot, Michela Antonelli and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A digital intervention for cognitive deficits following COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive Trajectories After Hospitalization for COVID-19: A 36-Month Longitudinal Study.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan J CheethamDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rose PenfoldDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Valentina GiunchigliaDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Vicky BowyerDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carole H SudreMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Liane S CanasSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jie DengSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Benjamin MurraySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Eric KerfootSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michela AntonelliSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Khaled RjoobMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Erika MolteniSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marc F ÖsterdahlDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas R HarveyDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
William R TrenderDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Michael H MalimDepartment of Infectious Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katie J DooresDepartment of Infectious Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter J HellyerCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marc ModatSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander HammersSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma L DuncanDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Adam HampshireDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Claire J StevesDepartment of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBImperial College London · GBMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W005611/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment has been reported after many types of infection, including SARS-CoV-2. Whether deficits following SARS-CoV-2 improve over time is unclear. Studies to date have focused on hospitalised individuals with up to a year follow-up. The presence, magnitude, persistence and correlations of effects in community-based cases remain relatively unexplored. Methods: Cognitive performance (working memory, attention, reasoning, motor control) was assessed in a prospective cohort study of participants from the United Kingdom COVID Symptom Study Biobank between July 12, 2021 and August 27, 2021 (Round 1), and between April 28, 2022 and June 21, 2022 (Round 2). Participants, recruited from the COVID Symptom Study smartphone app, comprised individuals with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection and varying symptom duration. Effects of COVID-19 exposures on cognitive accuracy and reaction time scores were estimated using multivariable ordinary least squares linear regression models weighted for inverse probability of participation, adjusting for potential confounders and mediators. The role of ongoing symptoms after COVID-19 infection was examined stratifying for self-perceived recovery. Longitudinal analysis assessed change in cognitive performance between rounds. Findings: 3335 individuals completed Round 1, of whom 1768 also completed Round 2. At Round 1, individuals with previous positive SARS-CoV-2 tests had lower cognitive accuracy (N = 1737, β = -0.14 standard deviations, SDs, 95% confidence intervals, CI: -0.21, -0.07) than negative controls. Deficits were largest for positive individuals with ≥12 weeks of symptoms (N = 495, β = -0.22 SDs, 95% CI: -0.35, -0.09). Effects were comparable to hospital presentation during illness (N = 281, β = -0.31 SDs, 95% CI: -0.44, -0.18), and 10 years age difference (60-70 years vs. 50-60 years, β = -0.21 SDs, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.13) in the whole study population. Stratification by self-reported recovery revealed that deficits were only detectable in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals who did not feel recovered from COVID-19, whereas individuals who reported full recovery showed no deficits. Longitudinal analysis showed no evidence of cognitive change over time, suggesting that cognitive deficits for affected individuals persisted at almost 2 years since initial infection. Interpretation: Cognitive deficits following SARS-CoV-2 infection were detectable nearly two years post infection, and largest for individuals with longer symptom durations, ongoing symptoms, and/or more severe infection. However, no such deficits were detected in individuals who reported full recovery from COVID-19. Further work is needed to monitor and develop understanding of recovery mechanisms for those with ongoing symptoms. Funding: Chronic Disease Research Foundation, Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Alzheimer's Society, European Union, COVID-19 Driver Relief Fund, French National Research Agency.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive impairmentCOVID-19COVID-19 recoveryLong COVIDSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37654669
PMCPMC10466229
OpenAlexW4385077238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.