Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37654515›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Clinical guidance for e-cigarette (vaping) cessation: Results from a modified Delphi panel approach.

Laurie Zawertailo, Erika Kouzoukas, Chantal Fougere, Rosa Dragonetti, Scott Veldhuizen, Peter Selby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Electronic cigarette for smoking cessation: a fast-track Delphi consensus of French-speaking experts.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurie ZawertailoNicotine Dependence Service, Addictions Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Erika KouzoukasNicotine Dependence Service, Addictions Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Chantal FougereNicotine Dependence Service, Addictions Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rosa DragonettiNicotine Dependence Service, Addictions Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Scott VeldhuizenNicotine Dependence Service, Addictions Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter SelbyNicotine Dependence Service, Addictions Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals seek help to stop their use of e-cigarettes from their healthcare practitioners. However, there is a paucity of published work addressing e-cigarette cessation methods empirically, and what evidence that is available is weak. Therefore, we developed an expert informed clinical resource to guide practitioners helping their clients quit using e-cigarettes. We conducted a modified Delphi process between September and December 2021 to reach consensus on clinical recommendations for e-cigarette cessation. Expert and Peer Panel members (n = 28) voted and provided feedback on the recommendations through three rounds of structured surveys, a discussion board, and one intermediate survey. The penultimate knowledge products underwent usability testing and were finalized based on user feedback. The Expert Panel maintained a 100% response rate for rounds 1 and 2 and 96% for round 3; the Peer Panel achieved a 100% response rate for all three rounds of the modified Delphi process. Consensus was reach on 24 recommendations and 2 statements spanning eight domains: severity and dependence; general approaches; treatment approaches; dual use; pharmacotherapy strategies; behavioural therapy strategies; harm reduction; and relapse prevention. Two additional 'no agreement' statements that did not reach consensus are included in the guidance resource. The recommendations were also contextualized for the following groups: adults; youth; people who are pregnant, breastfeeding and/or chestfeeding; and people with mental illness and/or substance use issues. The recommendations listed in the resource provide general clinical guidance on e-cigarette cessation to assist healthcare practitioners in the treatment planning process.

Indexed as

Addiction medicineCombustible tobaccoDelphiDual useE-cigaretteGuidanceSmokingVapingVaping cessation

Identifiers

PMID37654515
PMCPMC10466900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.