ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2023
Isolation Systems and its Effectiveness in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06487819 (Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Condition Post Longstanding Mouth Opening by Rubber Dam), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Condition Post Longstanding Mouth Opening by Rubber Dam (A Clinical and Radiographic Study)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Pediatric Patient Comfort: A Study of Moisture Isolation Techniques During Dental Treatments.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Effectiveness of Conservative and Surgical Management of Osteoradionecrosis: A Clinical Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Outcomes of Different Incisions Used for the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Comparative Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Longevity in Immediate and Delayed Loading of Crowns in Single-Piece Implants: A Prospective Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Success Rates of Conventional and Single-Piece Implant Systems: A Prospective Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Different Temporomandibular Joint Therapies for Internal Derangement Cases: A Comparative Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of Incidence, Prevalence, and Patterns of Maxillofacial Trauma: An Original Research.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for dental implant classification and peri-implant disease detection: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Evlauation of Fixation Techniques in Naso-orbito-ethmoidal Fractures: A Comparative Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Assessment of Complications in Dental Implant Surgery.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Effect of Implant Instrumentation Techniques in the Success of Implants: An Original Research.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques for Wisdom Tooth Extraction.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Patient and Operator Experiences with Conventional Rubber Dam and OptiDam: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The success of restoration processes depends on the efficient control of moisture and microorganisms. Dental restorative procedures frequently use rubber dams as an isolation technique. There is still room for evidence-based discussion over how rubber dam use affects the durability and caliber of dental restorations. In this review, the effects of rubber dam isolation vs alternative isolation techniques for dental restorative procedures are compared. Materials and Procedures: An extensive online search in the various databanks of the EMBASE, Medline, Pubmed, and Scopus was conducted. The keywords searched were "isolation, oral surgery, dental surgery, retractors, rubber dam, and methods of isolation." The studies selected were longitudinal research design and randomized trials. To ascertain the risk of bias, meta-analysis was carried out. The outcome was measured as the successful restoration at the end of follow-up period representing the thorough isolation. Results: A total of 1342 people were involved in six studies from across the world that were carried out between 2010 and 2015. High bias risk existed in all the studies. Five investigations compared the rubber dam vs cotton rolls. Due to discrepancies in the data supplied, one study was omitted from the analysis. Three of the four trials that were still running showed restored survival rates with all having a follow-up of at least six months. The survival of the restored composite teeth for six months in rubber dam isolation with odds ratio of 2.29, 1.38, and 1.00 at the end of six months, one year and one and half year respectively. However, the evidence was very low and speculative. The isolation was seen effective in the primary teeth specifically for the proximal lesions. None of the included studies discussed side effects or provided information on the treatment's upfront costs. Conclusion: The application of rubber dams in dental techniques may result in successful outcome compared to cotton rolls, according to some low-certainty evidence revealed in this research. Other times, the evidence is really ambiguous. It is necessary to conduct additional, high-quality studies investigating how rubber dam use affects various restorative procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.