Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37654293›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2023

Sampling Methods and their Prospects in Liquid-Based Cytology of Oral Mucosa: A Comparative Study.

Balaji Manohar, Shatabdi Chowdry, S Bhuvaneshwari, Syed Khaja Aliuddin, Dipak Chaudhari, Karishma Pathak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Balaji ManoharKalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Kiit Deemed to be University Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Shatabdi ChowdryKalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Kiit Deemed to be University Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
S BhuvaneshwariBuraydah Private College, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Syed Khaja AliuddinDDS[University of California], USA.
Dipak ChaudhariDDS[University of California], USA.
Karishma PathakRR Dental College and Hospital, Umarda, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examining epithelial cells in the mouth cavity is simple and non-invasive with exfoliative cytology. Liquid-based cytology is an additional diagnostic technique that can improve the specificity and sensitivity of conventional cytology. The purpose of our study was to describe the consistency of normal oral mucosa samples obtained with three different tools: the Cytobrush®, dermatological curette, and OralCDx® for liquid-based cytology. Literature review was done, and reporting of the improvements in the field of investigation and diagnosis has been reported. The present communication aims toward comparing three different sampling instruments such as Cytobrush, curette, and OralCDx for liquid-based cytology of the oral mucosa.

Indexed as

Liquid-based cytologyoral mucosasampling methods

Identifiers

PMID37654293
PMCPMC10466523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.