Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37654257›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2023

Mental Health Status of Health Care Professionals Working in Public and Private Sectors in Visakhapatnam: A Cross-Section Study.

Heena D Tiwari, Apurva K Pandya, Rajkiran Salunkhe, Mathew J Maliyil, Anish Nelson, Praveen K Varma, Rahul V C Tiwari, Priyanka Parhad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Heena D TiwariParul Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Parul University, Limda, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Apurva K PandyaParul Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Parul University, Limda, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Rajkiran SalunkheDepartment of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Mathew J MaliyilDepartment Public Health Dentistry, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Dental College, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anish NelsonNitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mangalore, India.
Praveen K VarmaDepartment of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rahul V C TiwariDepartment of OMFS, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.
Priyanka ParhadProgram Associate for Health and Wellness Centre, State Health Resource Centre, Chhattisgarh, India.
Institute of Public Health · INDhanalakshmi Srinivasan Group of Institutions · INGovernment Medical College · INManubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital · INNational Health Systems Resource Centre · INNitte University · INVishnu Dental College

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The material that is currently available on the psychological issues that doctors deal with is restricted to a few national surveys and certain particular hospital surveys. The motive of the current study was to define the mental health status of medical as well as surgical professionals working in the public and private sectors of Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Methodology: A self-reported questionnaire survey was used in an observational cross-sectional study to appraise the mental health state of both private and public medical practitioners. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) by William C. Menninger was applied. Results: The majority of study participants experienced psychological anguish, showing a substantial difference in the total level of psychological distress. When the Wellinger's Distress and the Kesslers Distress tools were compared, it was found that there was a substantial difference for all the variables taken into account in the current study, including gender, experience, marital status, children, and occupation, designation, and sector of work. Conclusion: Stress and burnout were more prevalent among medical specialists with lower yearly income, young ages, and fewer years of practice. Clinicians and policymakers must be proactive in creating programes that help healthcare professionals cope with stress and burnout.

Indexed as

HealthcareKesllers distress toolsmedicalstressWellinger’s distress

Identifiers

PMID37654257
PMCPMC10466560
OpenAlexW4384076333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.