Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653713›Full record

ArticleKorean circulation journal2023

Machine Learning Prediction for the Recurrence After Electrical Cardioversion of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Soonil Kwon, Eunjung Lee, Hojin Ju, Hyo-Jeong Ahn, So-Ryoung Lee, Eue-Keun Choi, Jangwon Suh, Seil Oh, Wonjong Rhee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean circulation journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuromodulation for Atrial Fibrillation Control.Korean circulation journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Soonil Kwon *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4791-6855
Eunjung Lee *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-9527
Hojin JuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-7611
Hyo-Jeong AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-0378
So-Ryoung LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6351-5015
Eue-Keun ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-6372
Jangwon SuhDepartment of Intelligence and Information, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6293-0444
Seil OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-9615
Wonjong RheeDepartment of Intelligence and Information, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. wonjong@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-8774
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Korean Cardiac Research Foundation 201901-01Ministry of Food and Drug SafetyMinistry of Health and WelfareMinistry of Science and Information and Communications TechnologyMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy, KoreaSeoul National University Bundang Hospital 0320202040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThere is limited evidence regarding machine-learning prediction for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after electrical cardioversion (ECV). This study aimed to predict the recurrence of AF after ECV using machine learning of clinical features and electrocardiograms (ECGs) in persistent AF patients.

methodsWe analyzed patients who underwent successful ECV for persistent AF. Machine learning was designed to predict patients with 1-month recurrence. Individual 12-lead ECGs were collected before and after ECV. Various clinical features were collected and trained the extreme gradient boost (XGBoost)-based model. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the performance of the model. The performance was compared to the C-statistics of the selected clinical features.

resultsAmong 718 patients (mean age 63.5±9.3 years, men 78.8%), AF recurred in 435 (60.6%) patients after 1 month. With the XGBoost-based model, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were 0.57, 0.60, and 0.63 if the model was trained by clinical features, ECGs, and both (the final model), respectively. For the final model, the sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score were 84.7%, 28.2%, and 0.73, respectively. Although the AF duration showed the best predictive performance (AUROC, 0.58) among the clinical features, it was significantly lower than that of the final machine-learning model (p<0.001). Additional training of extended monitoring data of 15-minute single-lead ECG and photoplethysmography in available patients (n=261) did not significantly improve the model's performance.

conclusionsMachine learning showed modest performance in predicting AF recurrence after ECV in persistent AF patients, warranting further validation studies.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationElectric countershockMachine learningRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID37653713
PMCPMC10625851
OpenAlexW4385586238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.