ArticleBMC cancer2023
Comparative efficacy and safety of different combinations of three CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapies in HR+/HER-2 - metastatic or advanced breast cancer patients: a network meta-analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in HR + and HER2-negative breast cancer; a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies.Targeted oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Confirming the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of HR+ advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Real-world treatment durations, subsequent treatments, and switching of CDK4/6 inhibitors among patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.The oncologist · 2026Observational
- Comparative effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: using the target trial emulation framework to investigate overall survival in routine care.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- CDK1 Signaling in Cancer Treatment: Advances in AI-based Strategies and Tools for New Cancer Drug Discovery.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a real-world study based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- First-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in combination with an aromatase inhibitor for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: A real-world cost-effectiveness assessment in a US Medicare-eligible population.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Efficiency of Fulvestrant Monotherapy After CDK4/6 Inhibitor Exposure: Is This a Viable Choice?Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Synergistic therapeutic effects of pertuzumab and pyrrolitinib in HER-2-positive breast cancer: modulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Toxicity profiles of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors: safety analysis from clinical trials and the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Advancements in breast cancer management: a comprehensive review of ribociclib combined with endocrine therapy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Trends in HR+ metastatic breast cancer survival before and after CDK4/6 inhibitor introduction in the United States: a SEER registry analysis of patients with HER2- and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Review
- Synergistic Enhancement of Antitumor Effects by Combining Abemaciclib with Desipramine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combinations involving three cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapies (ETs) in patients with metastatic or advanced breast cancer (BC) who are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-).
methodsWe initially identified relevant studies from previous meta-analyses and then conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases to locate additional studies published between February 2020 and September 2021. Essential data were extracted, and a network meta-analysis was performed using R 4.1.1 software with a random-effects model. Furthermore, we assigned rankings to all available treatment combinations by calculating their cumulative probability.
resultsData analysis included ten reports from nine studies. Pooled results demonstrated that each treatment combination significantly reduced the hazard risk of progression-free survival (PFS) compared to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant alone. However, there were no differences observed in PFS or overall survival (OS) among the different treatment combinations. Additionally, patients receiving palbociclib plus AI and abemaciclib plus AI or fulvestrant experienced more severe adverse events (AEs), with hazard ratios (HRs) of 10.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3 to 52.51) and 4.8 (95%CI = 1.41 to 16.21), respectively. The HR for ribociclib plus AI was 9.45 (95%CI = 2.02 to 43.61), and the HR for palbociclib plus fulvestrant was 6.33 (95%CI = 1.03 to 39.86). Based on the ranking probabilities, palbociclib plus fulvestrant had the highest probability of achieving superior PFS (37.65%), followed by abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (28.76%). For OS, ribociclib plus fulvestrant ranked first (34.11%), with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in second place (25.75%). In terms of safety, palbociclib plus AI (53.98%) or fulvestrant (51.37%) had the highest probabilities of being associated with adverse events.
conclusionsAbemaciclib plus fulvestrant or ribociclib plus AI appear to be effective and relatively safe for the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic or advanced BC patients. However, given the reliance on limited evidence, our findings require further validation through additional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.