Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653458›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Acceptability and readiness to promote human papillomavirus vaccination at ages 9-10 years: a feasibility study among North Carolina clinics.

Nadja A Vielot, Robyn M Lane, Kaitlyn Loefstedt, Jennifer L Cunningham, Jason Everson, Eli Tiller, Sarah E Johnson Patel, Jennifer S Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadja A Vielot *Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA. nadjavielot@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9004-0609
Robyn M Lane *Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA.
Kaitlyn LoefstedtDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer L CunninghamPiedmont Health Services, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jason EversonPiedmont Health Services, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Eli TillerPiedmont Health Services, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah E Johnson PatelPiedmont Health Services, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer S SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002489NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in adolescents as young as age 9, providers typically recommend it at ages 11-12. Studies suggest that recommending HPV vaccination at 9 or 10 years of age could increase up-to-date vaccination by age 13, which could especially benefit rural populations with reduced access to primary health care and lower HPV vaccination coverage than urban areas. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the age-9 recommendation of HPV vaccination in rural clinics. We conducted in-depth interviews with providers and staff from two primary care clinics in central North Carolina to understand attitudes toward recommending HPV vaccination to 9- and 10-year-olds. All interviewees agreed that HPV vaccination was important for cancer prevention and should be recommended before the onset of sexual activity, agreeing that HPV vaccination could be initiated before age 11 to improve timeliness and completion of the vaccination series. However, opinions were mixed on whether HPV vaccination should be initiated as young as 9 years old. Two key informants recruited from two university-affiliated clinics described their experiences recommending HPV vaccination to 9- and 10-year-olds, including a modified vaccination schedule that promotes HPV vaccination during routine well-child visits, prior to pubertal onset, and alongside other recommended adolescent vaccines. Age-9 recommendation and administration of HPV vaccination is possible with minimal changes to current clinical practices and could increase the convenience and acceptability of HPV vaccination in under-vaccinated settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentsHuman papillomavirusProvidersRecommendationsRuralUnderservedVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37653458
PMCPMC10470204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.