Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653405›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Quick adaptation of the organisation of general practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.

Peter P Groenewegen, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Ronald Batenburg, Esther Van Poel, Stijn van den Broek, Pierre Vanden Bussche, Sara Willems

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter P GroenewegenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands. p.groenewegen@nivel.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2127-8442
Maria van den MuijsenberghDepartment of Primary Care and Community Care, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ronald BatenburgNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Quality and Safety, Ghent, Belgium.
Stijn van den BroekNederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pierre Vanden BusscheDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Quality and Safety, Ghent, Belgium.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Quality and Safety, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practices have adapted the practice organisation to the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article we describe several adjustments in general practices in the field of patient flow management, appointments, triage, referral and infection prevention. We also examined how practices relate to the policy of the government and of the professional organisations during the pandemic.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among a sample of 893 general practitioners (GPs) during February and March 2021. The response rate was 17%. Because the questionnaire concerns practices and not individual GPs, one practice owner per practice received an invitation with a link to the online questionnaire. One reminder has been sent.

resultsGeneral practices adapted their organisation during the corona pandemic, partly based on information and advice from their professional organisations. The adjustments were necessary to ensure that patient care continued as much and as safely as possible, often remotely. The use of video consultations quickly increased from 6% to 65% of the practices. The cooperation with neighbouring practices improved and practices felt supported by the professional organisations.

conclusionsThe pandemic itself, remote care and stricter patient flow management have put pressure on the quality of care and patient safety. The accessibility of the practices was sometimes limited. In the perception of patients, this was stronger than in reality.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAcclimatizationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNetherlandsCOVID-19 pandemicGeneral practiceInfectious diseasePractice organisationPRICOV-19 studyPrimary careQuality of careThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID37653405
PMCPMC10472546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.