Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653398›Full record

Observational studyChiropractic & manual therapies2023

Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study.

Birgitte Lawaetz Myhrvold, Nina K Vøllestad, Pernille Irgens, Hilde Stendal Robinson, Iben Axén

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Birgitte Lawaetz MyhrvoldDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway. b.l.myhrvold@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-689X
Nina K VøllestadDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Pernille IrgensDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde Stendal RobinsonDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1089, 0317, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Iben AxénEt Liv I Bevegelse (ELiB), The Norwegian Chiropractic Research Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChiropractors' clinical indicators for recommending preventive continued care to patients with low back pain include previous pain episodes, a history of long pain duration and improvement after initial treatment. Our objectives were, in a cohort of patients with neck pain, to examine whether these clinical indicators were associated with being recommended continued care beyond 4 weeks, and if so whether this recommendation was dependent of chiropractor characteristics, as well as if the number of clinical indicators influenced this recommendation.

methodsIn this multi-center observational study, 172 patients seeking care for a new episode of neck pain in chiropractic practice in Norway were included between September 2015 and May 2016. The chiropractors treated their patients as per usual, and for this study, baseline data and 4-week follow-up data were used. Patient data included the clinical indicators (1) previous episodes of neck pain, (2) a history of long duration neck pain and (3) improvement four weeks after initial treatment. The recruiting chiropractors were asked at 4-week follow-up if each patient was recommended continued care, defined as care planned beyond the first 4 weeks. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models investigated the association between clinical indicators and the continued care recommendation, as well as the influence of chiropractor characteristics on this recommendation. Cross tabulations investigated the relationship between the number of indicators present and recommendation of continued care.

resultsLong duration of neck pain was the strongest clinical indicator for being recommended continued care 4 weeks after the initial treatment. Chiropractor characteristics were not associated with this recommendation. In patients with all three clinical indicators present, 39% were recommended continued care. When two and one indicators were present, the percentages of those recommended continued care were 25% and 10%, respectively.

conclusionChiropractors recommended continued care for patients experiencing neck pain based on their history of long pain duration, and this was not influenced by characteristics of the chiropractor. This differs from previous studies of indicators for maintenance care in patients with low back pain.

Indexed as

ChiropracticLow Back PainCohort StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansNeck PainClinical indicatorsContinued careNeck painNeck pain duration

Identifiers

PMID37653398
PMCPMC10472687
OpenAlexW4386331798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.