Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653167›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2023

Treatment of Fusarium Infection of the Central Nervous System: A Review of Past Cases to Guide Therapy for the Ongoing 2023 Outbreak in the United States and Mexico.

Martin Hoenigl, Jeffrey D Jenks, Matthias Egger, Marcio Nucci, George R Thompson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fusariosis in the Sphere.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Outbreak ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Editorial: Emerging fungal pathogens: perspectives.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin Hoenigl *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, ECMM Excellence Center for Medical Mycology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria. hoeniglmartin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-2824
Jeffrey D Jenks *Durham County Department of Public Health, Durham, NC, USA.
Matthias EggerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, ECMM Excellence Center for Medical Mycology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Marcio NucciUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
George R ThompsonUniversity of California Davis Center for Valley Fever, Davis, CA, USA. grthompson@ucdavis.edu.
Medical University of Graz · ATDuke University · USUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFusariosis of the central nervous system (CNS) is extremely uncommon. Treatment and outcome data from previously published cases may provide some guidance in light of the ongoing fungal meningitis outbreak in 2023 involving Fusarium spp. in the United States and Mexico.

methodsWe reviewed the published literature describing cases of invasive fusariosis of the (CNS) that included data on patient demographic characteristics, treatment, and outcome.

resultsTwenty-six cases met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 36 years, 55% involved females, 60% had underlying hematologic malignancy, and another 16% were on immunosuppressants. The majority of infections were from Fusarium solani species complex. Overall 72% of patients died. The majority received monotherapy with amphotericin B, although some received voriconazole monotherapy or combination therapy with amphotericin B plus voriconazole with or without adjuvant surgery. Among the survivors, 3 received amphotericin B monotherapy, 2 voriconazole monotherapy, 1 combination therapy of both, and one surgery only.

conclusionThe overall mortality rate in published cases of fusariosis of the CNS was high, although-unlike during the current outbreak-the preponderance of patients were severely immunocompromised. While historically the majority were treated with amphotericin B monotherapy, some recent patients were treated with voriconazole monotherapy or combination therapy with amphotericin B plus voriconazole. Current guidelines recommend monotherapy with voriconazole or lipid formulations of amphotericin B or combination of both for the treatment of invasive fusariosis, which is in line with the findings from our literature review and should be considered during the ongoing 2023 outbreak.

Indexed as

FusariosisFusariumAdultAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCentral Nervous SystemFemaleHumansMexicoUnited StatesVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsVoriconazoleFungal meningitisFungal meningitis outbreakFusariosis meningitisFusarium solaniFusarium spp.

Identifiers

PMID37653167
PMCPMC10687128
OpenAlexW4386347472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.