Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653144›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

The meniscal extrusion index is a reliable indirect sign of different meniscal lesion patterns: a classification based on percentage of meniscal extrusion.

Riccardo Compagnoni, Paolo Ferrua, Carlo Minoli, Raschid Fajury, Rossella Ravaglia, Alessandra Menon, Pietro Simone Randelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Arthroscopic Repair of Extruded Meniscus Tears: Impact on Symptom Relief and Functional Improvement - A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo CompagnoniDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via della Commenda, 10, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Paolo FerruaLaboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Carlo MinoliU.O.C. Week Surgery, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy. carlo.minoli@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-6950
Raschid FajuryU.O.C. 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Rossella RavagliaU.O.C. 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra MenonLaboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Pietro Simone RandelliLaboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIstituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study's goal is to propose a straightforward classification system based on the MEI (Meniscal Extrusion Index), a measure of meniscal extrusion, that relates to various meniscal lesion patterns and has clinical and biomechanical significance. The study's secondary goal is to determine whether the standard 3 mm meniscal extrusion parameter still has value by correlating the MEI with it.

methods1350 knee MRIs that were performed over the course of 2 years made up the study cohort. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 200 of those patients were qualified to participate in the study. All the measurements examined for this study underwent an interobserver reliability test.

resultsIn the 1350 MRIs that were examined for this study, meniscal extrusion of any grade was present 18.9% of the time. The use of the MEI revealed three groups of patients: those with a MEI < 20%, who are likely para-physiological; those with a MEY between 20% and 40%, who are in a grey area; and those with a MEY > 40%, who have lesions that are impairing the proper meniscal function. According to the authors' findings, the percentage of meniscal extrusion did not correlate with the finite number (3 mm), making the 3 mm parameter an unreliable evaluation method.

conclusionsThis study is clinically relevant, because it proposes a simple and reproducible classification of meniscal extrusion that may aid in evaluating the severity of an extrusion and help in the diagnosis of lesions that might be difficult to identify on MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

MeniscusTibial Meniscus InjuriesArthroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMenisci, TibialReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArthroscopyClassificationExtrusionImagingKneeMeniscal Extrusion IndexMeniscusMRIRootTear

Identifiers

PMID37653144
PMCPMC10598112
OpenAlexW4386348008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.