Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653107›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2023

Addressing Evaluation Barriers with Early Innovation Development for Adolescent-Focused Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions.

Kelly L Wilson, Sarah Axelson, Whitney R Garney, Kristen M Garcia, Katy Suellentrop, Christi H Esquivel

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward an Effective Innovation Framework for Federal Grant-Making: an Exploration into OPA's Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly L WilsonTexas A&M University College Station, College Station, TX, USA. kwilson@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8082-9983
Sarah AxelsonPower to Decide, Washington, DC, USA.
Whitney R GarneyTexas A&M University College Station, College Station, TX, USA.
Kristen M GarciaTexas A&M University College Station, College Station, TX, USA.
Katy SuellentropRTI International, Washington, DC, USA.
Christi H EsquivelTexas A&M University College Station, College Station, TX, USA.
Texas A&M University · USRTI International · US

Funding

Office of Population Affairs TP2AH000023Office of Population Affairs TP2AH000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention programs focus on individual-level sexual health outcomes (e.g., STIs, pregnancy, teen births). To expand program and intervention approaches within teen pregnancy prevention (TPP), the Department of Health and Human Services funded two grantees, Innovative Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs (iTP3) and Innovation Next (IN) to support and enable early innovation to advance adolescent health and prevent teen pregnancy. The pipeline to support and enable innovation in adolescent health is complex, resulting in barriers and challenges to research and evaluation of novel programs. This paper presents some of the barriers encountered by the grantees. Data for this paper was collected from key personnel and secondary data sources. Focus group participants included seven representatives (n = 7) across the two organizations. Focus group questions assessed barriers related to innovative intervention development and evaluation. Key findings include four barriers to evaluation when fostering innovative adolescent-focused pregnancy prevention interventions. These included (a) funding constraints on evaluation activities, (b) innovation readiness for rigorous testing, (c) evaluation knowledge and expertise on innovation-development teams, and (d) challenges with evaluation requirements. Novel and promising system- and technology-focused interventions with the potential to impact TPP require alternative tools and approaches for evaluation. This would allow research to focus on how systems-level change mechanisms (i.e., policy, access to care) impact sexual risk behaviors and better understand ecological and social determinants of health for the priority population. The advancement of approaches to impact adolescent health identifies the need to expand the focus of evidence-based interventions beyond the adolescent themselves and understand approaches that impact external contexts and environments related to reducing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) risk-taking.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthPregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentFemaleHumansPregnancyReproductive HealthSex EducationSexual BehaviorAdolescent healthAdolescent pregnancy preventionEvaluation challengesInnovation

Identifiers

PMID37653107
PMCPMC10764385
OpenAlexW4386318973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.