Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37652997›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023

Rules of teeth development align microevolution with macroevolution in extant and extinct primates.

Fabio A Machado, Carrie S Mongle, Graham Slater, Anna Penna, Anna Wisniewski, Anna Soffin, Vitor Dutra, Josef C Uyeda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
25.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Six million years of vole dental evolution shaped by tooth development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio A MachadoDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. fabio.machado@okstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0215-9926
Carrie S MongleDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5474-0501
Graham SlaterDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anna PennaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-317X
Anna WisniewskiDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anna SoffinDepartment of Biology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Vitor DutraDepartment of Anthropology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Josef C UyedaDepartment of Biology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
University of Chicago · USVirginia Tech · USFlorida Atlantic University · USOklahoma State University · USStony Brook University · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

NSF | BIO | Division of Environmental Biology (DEB) DEB-1942717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroevolutionary biologists have classically rejected the notion that higher-level patterns of divergence arise through microevolutionary processes acting within populations. For morphology, this consensus partly derives from the inability of quantitative genetics models to correctly predict the behaviour of evolutionary processes at the scale of millions of years. Developmental studies (evo-devo) have been proposed to reconcile micro- and macroevolution. However, there has been little progress in establishing a formal framework to apply evo-devo models of phenotypic diversification. Here we reframe this issue by asking whether using evo-devo models to quantify biological variation can improve the explanatory power of comparative models, thus helping us bridge the gap between micro- and macroevolution. We test this prediction by evaluating the evolution of primate lower molars in a comprehensive dataset densely sampled across living and extinct taxa. Our results suggest that biologically informed morphospaces alongside quantitative genetics models allow a seamless transition between the micro- and macroscales, whereas biologically uninformed spaces do not. We show that the adaptive landscape for primate teeth is corridor like, with changes in morphology within the corridor being nearly neutral. Overall, our framework provides a basis for integrating evo-devo into the modern synthesis, allowing an operational way to evaluate the ultimate causes of macroevolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPrimatesAnimalsFossilsModels, BiologicalMolarTooth

Identifiers

PMID37652997
OpenAlexW4386332633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.