Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37652994›Full record

ReviewTranslational psychiatry2023

Military-related mild traumatic brain injury: clinical characteristics, advanced neuroimaging, and molecular mechanisms.

Sharon Y Kim, Ping-Hong Yeh, John M Ollinger, Herman D Morris, Maureen N Hood, Vincent B Ho, Kwang H Choi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon Y KimSchool of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ping-Hong YehNational Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
John M OllingerProgram in Neuroscience, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Herman D MorrisDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maureen N HoodDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-9262
Vincent B HoDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kwang H ChoiProgram in Neuroscience, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA. Kwang.choi@usuhs.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2884-4996
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a significant health burden among military service members. Although mTBI was once considered relatively benign compared to more severe TBIs, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated the devastating neurological consequences of mTBI, including chronic post-concussion symptoms and deficits in cognition, memory, sleep, vision, and hearing. The discovery of reliable biomarkers for mTBI has been challenging due to under-reporting and heterogeneity of military-related mTBI, unpredictability of pathological changes, and delay of post-injury clinical evaluations. Moreover, compared to more severe TBI, mTBI is especially difficult to diagnose due to the lack of overt clinical neuroimaging findings. Yet, advanced neuroimaging techniques using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hold promise in detecting microstructural aberrations following mTBI. Using different pulse sequences, MRI enables the evaluation of different tissue characteristics without risks associated with ionizing radiation inherent to other imaging modalities, such as X-ray-based studies or computerized tomography (CT). Accordingly, considering the high morbidity of mTBI in military populations, debilitating post-injury symptoms, and lack of robust neuroimaging biomarkers, this review (1) summarizes the nature and mechanisms of mTBI in military settings, (2) describes clinical characteristics of military-related mTBI and associated comorbidities, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), (3) highlights advanced neuroimaging techniques used to study mTBI and the molecular mechanisms that can be inferred, and (4) discusses emerging frontiers in advanced neuroimaging for mTBI. We encourage multi-modal approaches combining neuropsychiatric, blood-based, and genetic data as well as the discovery and employment of new imaging techniques with big data analytics that enable accurate detection of post-injury pathologic aberrations related to tissue microstructure, glymphatic function, and neurodegeneration. Ultimately, this review provides a foundational overview of military-related mTBI and advanced neuroimaging techniques that merit further study for mTBI diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticMilitary PersonnelCognitionHumansNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID37652994
PMCPMC10471788
OpenAlexW4386317067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.