Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37652965›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2023

New cut-off points of PHQ-9 and its variants, in Costa Rica: a nationwide observational study.

Armando González-Sánchez, Raúl Ortega-Moreno, Greibin Villegas-Barahona, Eva Carazo-Vargas, Harold Arias-LeClaire, Purificación Vicente-Galindo

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association of performance status, depression, and demographics with advance directive documentation in patients with glioblastoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armando González-SánchezDepartment of Statistics and Operative Research, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno. C/ Alfonso X El Sabio, S/N, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. armando_gonzalez@usal.es.
Raúl Ortega-MorenoPsychology School, National University, Costa Rica (UNA), Heredia, Costa Rica.
Greibin Villegas-BarahonaDistance State University, Costa Rica (UNED), San Jose, Costa Rica.
Eva Carazo-VargasDistance State University, Costa Rica (UNED), San Jose, Costa Rica.
Harold Arias-LeClaireDistance State University, Costa Rica (UNED), San Jose, Costa Rica.
Purificación Vicente-GalindoDepartment of Statistics and Operative Research, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno. C/ Alfonso X El Sabio, S/N, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PHQ-9 questionnaire is a screening test worldwide used to measure depression. But it cannot be used in Costa Rica, due to the fact that it has not previously been validated for its population. The present study aims to show the validation of the PHQ-9 questionnaire and its variants (PHQ-2, PHQ-4, PHQ-8) in a population sample of adults residing in Costa Rica. A sample was collected (n = 1162) using a self-administered questionnaire. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) were tested. One factor was found that explained 73.33% of the variance with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.928). Goodness-of-fit measures were adequate (RMSEA = 0.107; CFI = 0.948), as was diagnostic power at a cut-off of 10 (78.60 for Sensitivity and 27.95 for 1-Specificity). External validation indices were good (r = 0.843 with GAD-7, r = - 0.647 with RS14, and r = 0.301 with FCV19S), and the model showed invariance by sex (∆χ

Indexed as

AnxietyPatient Health QuestionnaireAnxiety DisordersCosta RicaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID37652965
PMCPMC10471633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.