ArticleAcute and critical care2023
Comparison of intracranial pressure prediction in hydrocephalus patients among linear, non-linear, and machine learning regression models in Thailand.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram for the prediction of traumatic intracranial abnormalities in the elderly: Development and validation.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- Arrested hydrocephalus and beyond: advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of various forms of chronic hydrocephalus: a comprehensive narrative review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Impact of Preoperative Hair Removal on Self-Esteem after Brain Tumor Surgery.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Automated Semisupervised Measurement of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter From CT Following Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage determined by intracranial pressure thresholds.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based model for detection of intracranial waveforms with poor brain compliance in southern Thailand.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Imaging biomarkers for detection and longitudinal monitoring of ventricular abnormalities from birth to childhood.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury in Southern Thailand.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Progressive Optic Neuropathy in Hydrocephalic Ccdc13 Mutant Mice Caused by Impaired Axoplasmic Transport at the Optic Nerve Head.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHydrocephalus (HCP) is one of the most significant concerns in neurosurgical patients because it can cause increased intracranial pressure (ICP), resulting in mortality and morbidity. To date, machine learning (ML) has been helpful in predicting continuous outcomes. The primary objective of the present study was to identify the factors correlated with ICP, while the secondary objective was to compare the predictive performances among linear, non-linear, and ML regression models for ICP prediction.
methodsA total of 412 patients with various types of HCP who had undergone ventriculostomy was retrospectively included in the present study, and intraoperative ICP was recorded following ventricular catheter insertion. Several clinical factors and imaging parameters were analyzed for the relationship with ICP by linear correlation. The predictive performance of ICP was compared among linear, non-linear, and ML regression models.
resultsOptic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) had a moderately positive correlation with ICP (r=0.530, P<0.001), while several ventricular indexes were not statistically significant in correlation with ICP. For prediction of ICP, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms had low mean absolute error and root mean square error values and high R2 values compared to linear and non-linear regression when the predictive model included ONSD and ventricular indexes.
conclusionsThe XGBoost and RF algorithms are advantageous for predicting preoperative ICP and establishing prognoses for HCP patients. Furthermore, ML-based prediction could be used as a non-invasive method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.