ReviewJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024
Report from the society of magnetic resonance angiography: clinical applications of 7T neurovascular MR in the assessment of intracranial vascular disease.
Review in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atypical variants of the cerebral arterial circle beyond the Lazorthes classification: a retrospective morphologic and neuroradiologic study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Comparison of 5.0T and 3.0T time-of-flight MR angiography for visualizing the anterior choroidal artery.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Radiofrequency Treatment of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia in the V2 Maxillary Nerve.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Cerebrovascular morphology: Insights into normal variations, aging effects and disease implications.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025Review
- Vessel wall MRI in giant cell arteritis: standardized protocol and scoring approach developed by an international working group.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- The evaluation value of intracranial magnetic resonance angiography combined with carotid ultrasound in cerebral infarction.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Time-of-flight MRA of intracranial vessels at 7 T.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications have been rapidly increasing in both clinical research and practice. Indeed, 7-Tesla (7T) MRI allows improved depiction of smaller structures with high signal-to-noise ratio, and, therefore, may improve lesion visualization, diagnostic capabilities, and thus potentially affect treatment decision-making. Incremental evidence emerging from research over the past two decades has provided a promising prospect of 7T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the evaluation of intracranial vasculature. The ultra-high resolution and excellent image quality of 7T MRA allow us to explore detailed morphological and hemodynamic information, detect subtle pathological changes in early stages, and provide new insights allowing for deeper understanding of pathological mechanisms of various cerebrovascular diseases. However, along with the benefits of ultra-high field strength, some challenges and concerns exist. Despite these, ongoing technical developments and clinical oriented research will facilitate the widespread clinical application of 7T MRA in the near future. In this review article, we summarize technical aspects, clinical applications, and recent advances of 7T MRA in the evaluation of intracranial vascular disease. The aim of this review is to provide a clinical perspective for the potential application of 7T MRA for the assessment of intracranial vascular disease, and to explore possible future research directions implementing this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.