ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023
Automatic Localization of the Pons and Vermis on Fetal Brain MR Imaging Using a U-Net Deep Learning Model.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Roles and applications of artificial intelligence in fetal and placental MRI: a literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Fetal MRI Analysis of Corpus Callosal Abnormalities: Classification, and Associated Anomalies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automatic Ventriculomegaly Detection in Fetal Brain MRI: A Step-by-Step Deep Learning Model for Novel 2D-3D Linear Measurements.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAn MRI of the fetus can enhance the identification of perinatal developmental disorders, which improves the accuracy of ultrasound. Manual MRI measurements require training, time, and intra-variability concerns. Pediatric neuroradiologists are also in short supply. Our purpose was developing a deep learning model and pipeline for automatically identifying anatomic landmarks on the pons and vermis in fetal brain MR imaging and suggesting suitable images for measuring the pons and vermis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively used 55 pregnant patients who underwent fetal brain MR imaging with a HASTE protocol. Pediatric neuroradiologists selected them for landmark annotation on sagittal single-shot T2-weighted images, and the clinically reliable method was used as the criterion standard for the measurement of the pons and vermis. A U-Net-based deep learning model was developed to automatically identify fetal brain anatomic landmarks, including the 2 anterior-posterior landmarks of the pons and 2 anterior-posterior and 2 superior-inferior landmarks of the vermis. Four-fold cross-validation was performed to test the accuracy of the model using randomly divided and sorted gestational age-divided data sets. A confidence score of model prediction was generated for each testing case.
resultsOverall, 85% of the testing results showed a ≥90% confidence, with a mean error of <2.22 mm, providing overall better estimation results with fewer errors and higher confidence scores. The anterior and posterior pons and anterior vermis showed better estimation (which means fewer errors in landmark localization) and accuracy and a higher confidence level than other landmarks. We also developed a graphic user interface for clinical use.
conclusionsThis deep learning-facilitated pipeline practically shortens the time spent on selecting good-quality fetal brain images and performing anatomic measurements for radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.