ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2023
Toxic element contaminations of prenatal vitamins.
Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxidative Stress-Related Metabolomic Alterations in Pregnancy: Evidence from Exposure to Air Pollution, Metals/Metalloid, and Tobacco Smoke.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Content of selected nutrients and heavy metals in prenatal multivitamins and minerals: an observational study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The detrimental effects of gestational and lactational exposure to adverse chemical agents are gathering increasing attention. In our study, the presence of toxic heavy metals in several prenatal vitamins from six brands available in supermarkets and pharmacies was measured using ICP mass spectrometry. Several toxic heavy metals were detected, some at levels that could have potential toxicity to the fetus and the mother as well. Previous studies have also detected toxic heavy metals in prenatal and other vitamins. One of the reasons for toxic heavy metals in "natural vitamins" sold to consumers is that they are produced from naturally grown material and not synthesized. They are likely exposed to the heavy metals from the ground that they are grown in and there has not been any significant attempt to get rid of them before the vitamin pill was sold to consumers. Thus, this problem is not an isolated issue and regulatory agencies should be dealing more aggressively than they have been doing. In fact, several papers have already been published showing similar findings as we are reporting here. The vitamin pills we analyzed have elevated levels of boron, aluminum, molybdenum, barium, lead, titanium, nickel, arsenic, strontium, and cadmium. The levels of total chromium were also elevated but we did not separately determine Cr(III) and the much more hazardous Cr(VI), because of the tedious procedure required to separate these two forms of Cr.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.