Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651955›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2023

Mechanotransduction: Forcing a change in metabolism.

Logan W Dawson, Nicholas M Cronin, Kris A DeMali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. E-Cadherin: A conductor of cellular signaling.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Microphysiological gut-on-chip enables extendedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Tubulin Acetylation and the Cellular Mechanosensing and Stress Response.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Logan W DawsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Nicholas M CroninDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Kris A DeMaliDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: kris-demali@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying E-cadherin MechanotransductionR35GM136291 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Kris A DeMali · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Predoctoral Training in the Pharmacological SciencesT32GM144636 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI David L. Roman, STEFAN STRACK · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136291NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial and endothelial cells experience numerous mechanical cues throughout their lifetimes. Cells resist these forces by fortifying their cytoskeletal networks and adhesions. This reinforcement is energetically costly. Here we describe how these energetic demands are met. We focus on the response of epithelial and endothelial cells to mechanical cues, describe the energetic needs of epithelia and endothelia, and identify the mechanisms these cells employ to increase glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, and fatty acid metabolism. We discuss the similarities and differences in the responses of the two cell types.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsMechanotransduction, CellularCuesCytoskeletonLipid Metabolism

Identifiers

PMID37651955
PMCPMC10523412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.