Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651773›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of physical therapy

Are alterations in running biomechanics associated with running injuries? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Alexandre Dias Lopes, Angelie Mascarinas, Luiz Hespanhol

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandre Dias LopesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement & Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: a.lopes@northeastern.edu.
Angelie MascarinasStaff Physician - Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Luiz HespanholMasters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; Amsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health and the Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo systematic review has investigated the main biomechanical variables as predictors of running-related injuries.

objectiveTo investigate the main biomechanical variables associated with running-related injuries.

methodsMedline via PubMed, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception until 1 November 2021. Each study included must have investigated the association of at least one biomechanical variable (kinetics, kinematics, electromyography, or pressure distribution) with running injuries. The meta-analysis was conducted, and a modified version of the Downs and Black Quality Index was used for methodological quality evaluation.

resultsAcross the 82 studies included, 5465 runners were investigated. The meta-analysis was conducted with 11 biomechanical variables from 51 articles (n=2395). The peak hip adduction angle was the sole biomechanical variable associated with running injury and was found to be higher in injured runners (0.57, 95% CI 0.21, 0.94) compared to uninjured runners. However, this result was highly influenced by two studies (out of five studies) conducted by the same group of authors.

conclusionClinicians, coaches, and runners should be aware that minimal evidence supports that alterations of running biomechanics are associated with running-related injuries. Heterogeneity in evaluation conditions and inconsistency in the naming and definitions of biomechanical variables make definitive conclusions challenging. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, CRD42017068839.

Indexed as

RunningBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHumansBiomechanicsInjuryPhysical therapyRehabilitationRunning

Identifiers

PMID37651773
PMCPMC10480598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.