Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651686›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Crohn's & colitis2024

Efficacy and Safety of Approximately 3 Years of Continuous Ozanimod in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Interim Analysis of the True North Open-label Extension.

Silvio Danese, Remo Panaccione, Maria T Abreu, David T Rubin, Subrata Ghosh, Axel Dignass, Anita Afzali, Douglas C Wolf, Michael V Chiorean, Severine Vermeire and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Drug Development in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: What Is Next?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Silvio DaneseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-1351
Remo PanaccioneInflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Gastrointestinal Research, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-940X
Maria T AbreuCrohn's & Colitis Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
David T RubinSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5647-1723
Subrata GhoshUniversity College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1713-7797
Axel DignassDepartment of Medicine, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anita AfzaliUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Douglas C WolfInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael V ChioreanInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Swedish Gastroenterology, Issaquah, WA, USA.
Severine VermeireDepartment of Chronic Diseases & Metabolism, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9942-3019
Anjali JainTranslational Sciences and Medical Affairs, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Lorna CharlesWorldwide Patient Safety, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Garrett LawlorGI Medicine, US Medical Affairs I&F, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mark T OstermanDisease Area Head, Gastroenterology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Hsiuanlin WuStatistician, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
James B CanavanBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
AnnKatrin PetersenClinical Research at Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jean-Frederic ColombelDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-249X
Miguel RegueiroDigestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7681-8111
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USAtlanta Gastroenterology Associates · USCleveland Clinic · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITKU Leuven · BESwedish Medical Center · USUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND

aimsThis interim analysis from the True North open-label extension [OLE] study examines efficacy and safety of approximately 3 years of continuous ozanimod treatment in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

methodsClinical responders after 52 weeks of ozanimod during the phase 3 True North study, who continued treatment in the OLE, were evaluated. Efficacy, including endoscopic and histological endpoints, was assessed during the OLE for approximately 2 additional years through OLE Week 94, using observed case [OC] and nonresponder imputation [NRI] analyses. Adverse events were monitored from True North baseline through OLE data cutoff and expressed as exposure-adjusted incidence rates.

resultsThis analysis included 131 patients; 54% had achieved corticosteroid-free remission at True North Week 52. In OC analyses, clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free remission were achieved by 91.4%, 69.1%, and 67.9% of patients, respectively, at OLE Week 94 [146 weeks of total treatment]. Similarly, endoscopic improvement, histological remission, and mucosal healing were achieved by 73.3%, 67.3%, and 56.3% of patients, respectively, at OLE Week 94. Efficacy rates were lower using NRI analyses, but maintenance of efficacy was demonstrated through OLE Week 94. No new safety signals emerged from this analysis. Serious infections, malignancy, cardiovascular events, and hepatic events occurred infrequently.

conclusionsAmong patients who achieved clinical response after 1 year of ozanimod treatment during True North, a high percentage sustained clinical and mucosal efficacy over 2 additional years in the OLE. No new safety signals were observed with long-term ozanimod use.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeIndansOxadiazolesAdrenal Cortex HormonesHumansRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesIndansOxadiazolesozanimodozanimodS1P receptor modulatorUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID37651686
PMCPMC10896634
OpenAlexW4386317272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.