Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651444›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Using individual-based bioenergetic models to predict the aggregate effects of disturbance on populations: A case study with beaked whales and Navy sonar.

Vincent Hin, André M de Roos, Kelly J Benoit-Bird, Diane E Claridge, Nancy DiMarzio, John W Durban, Erin A Falcone, Eiren K Jacobson, Charlotte M Jones-Todd, Enrico Pirotta and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vincent HinInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9497-1224
André M de RoosInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kelly J Benoit-BirdMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, United States of America.
Diane E ClaridgeBahamas Marine Mammal Research Organization, Abaco, Bahamas.
Nancy DiMarzioNaval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, Rhode Island, United States of America.
John W DurbanSEA Inc., Aptos, California, United States of America.
Erin A FalconeMarine Ecology and Telemetry Research, Seabeck, Washington, United States of America.
Eiren K JacobsonCentre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Charlotte M Jones-ToddDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Enrico PirottaCentre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-3676
Gregory S SchorrMarine Ecology and Telemetry Research, Seabeck, Washington, United States of America.
Len ThomasCentre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7436-067X
Stephanie WatwoodNaval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, Rhode Island, United States of America.
John HarwoodCentre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities can lead to changes in animal behavior. Predicting population consequences of these behavioral changes requires integrating short-term individual responses into models that forecast population dynamics across multiple generations. This is especially challenging for long-lived animals, because of the different time scales involved. Beaked whales are a group of deep-diving odontocete whales that respond behaviorally when exposed to military mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS), but the effect of these nonlethal responses on beaked whale populations is unknown. Population consequences of aggregate exposure to MFAS was assessed for two beaked whale populations that are regularly present on U.S. Navy training ranges where MFAS is frequently used. Our approach integrates a wide range of data sources, including telemetry data, information on spatial variation in habitat quality, passive acoustic data on the temporal pattern of sonar use and its relationship to beaked whale foraging activity, into an individual-based model with a dynamic bioenergetic module that governs individual life history. The predicted effect of disturbance from MFAS on population abundance ranged between population extinction to a slight increase in population abundance. These effects were driven by the interaction between the temporal pattern of MFAS use, baseline movement patterns, the spatial distribution of prey, the nature of beaked whale behavioral response to MFAS and the top-down impact of whale foraging on prey abundance. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for monitoring of marine mammal populations and highlight key uncertainties to help guide future directions for assessing population impacts of nonlethal disturbance for these and other long-lived animals.

Indexed as

CaniformiaWhalesAcousticsAnimalsAnthropogenic EffectsBehavior, AnimalSound

Identifiers

PMID37651444
PMCPMC10470956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.