Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651162›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

We Cannot Put This Genie Back in the Bottle: Qualitative Interview Study Among Family Medicine Providers About Their Experiences With Virtual Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Saskia T Spiess, Elena Gardner, Cindy Turner, Annie Galt, Katherine Fortenberry, Tiffany Ho, Jordan Knox, Dominik Ose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saskia T SpiessDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-8173-1907
Elena GardnerDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5130-7617
Cindy TurnerDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5250-3409
Annie GaltDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1828-1360
Katherine FortenberryDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-8553
Tiffany HoDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9332-9777
Jordan KnoxDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-9732-941X
Dominik OseDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5079-2152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen a genie is freed from its bottle, things cannot be restored to the way they were before. At the beginning of the global COVID-19 pandemic, health care systems adjusted how they delivered care overnight. Primary care practices switched from seeing patients in person to virtual care applications, including video and phone visits, e-visits, e-consults, and messaging with clinicians. Prior to the pandemic, these applications were not as widely used, but discussions around their advantages and disadvantages in some settings were being explored. Emergency regulatory changes spurred by the pandemic freed this virtual care "genie" from its bottle. Wide-scale adoption of virtual care in family medicine has much potential, as primary care services are often a patient's first point of contact with the health care system.

objectiveThis study aims to analyze family medicine providers' experiences using virtual visits during the pandemic, perceived outcomes of the shift to virtual visits, and discusses its implications for the future of family medicine.

methodsThis qualitative study took place at 3 academic primary care clinics between June and December 2020. Data were collected through one-on-one Zoom (version 5.2.1) interviews with family medicine clinical faculty who experienced the rapid transition of in-person visits to mostly "virtual" visits. The interviews were recorded, deidentified, and transcribed. We adopted a constructivist approach to qualitative content analysis to evaluate the results.

resultsIn total, 25 participants were eligible, and 20 individuals participated in this study (80% participation rate). The mean age was 43.4 years, and 85% (17/20) of the participants were female. We identified 3 main themes: the care process, patient engagement, and team-based care.

conclusionsThis study highlights the transition from in-person to virtual visits during the pandemic from the perspective of family medicine providers. Generally, family medicine providers' perceptions of the shift to virtual visits were positive, especially regarding team-based care. Challenges involved virtual inhibition, particularly for providers. Providers described ways they integrated virtual care with aspects of in-person care, creating a hybrid environment. The genie is out of the bottle-things will not be the same-but family medicine now has the opportunity to evolve.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMethylmethacrylatesPandemicsQualitative ResearchGenieMethylmethacrylatesCOVID-19family medicineprimary caretelemedicinevirtual visits

Identifiers

PMID37651162
PMCPMC10502598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.