Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651044›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2023

Analysis on the Marketing Trend and Approval Lag of Imported Orphan Drugs from 2010 to 2021 in China.

Feifei Peng, Hang Zheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feifei PengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, #1 Yixueyuan Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Hang ZhengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, #1 Yixueyuan Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. scnczh1979@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to meet the unmet needs of rare disease patients in China, importing orphan drugs is an important way. The objectives of this study were to investigate the marketing trend of orphan drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and imported by China, to examine the orphan drug lag between China and the United States.

methodsThis study analyzes the orphan drugs approved by FDA and imported by China from January 2010 to December 2021. The approval lag for orphan drugs between China and the US was calculated and analyzed by approval time. Factors potentially affecting the approval lag, such as target disease, ATC classification, formulation, corporation name, drug type, and whether the indications belong to the first batch of rare diseases catalogue were investigated.

resultsThe number of FDA-approved orphan drugs imported by China is increasing year by year, and the approval lag of these drugs is gradually decreasing, especially in the classification of Non-L, Injections, Non-United States, and biological product. Compared with 2010-2015, the approval lag of total drugs in the study was significantly improved in 2016-2021 (1977 days) compared with 2010-2015 (3928 days).

conclusionChina's groundbreaking regulatory reforms of drugs since 2015 had made significant progress in reducing orphan drug lags, but there is still considerable room for progress. We should more actively promote the approval of rare disease drugs in China, establish a better approval mechanism, and enable Chinese patients with rare diseases to receive drug treatment in a timely manner.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalMarketingOrphan Drug ProductionChinaHumansRare DiseasesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationApproval lagChinaMarketing trendOrphan drugsRare disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.