Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37651038›Full record

Trial reportAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2024

The Positive Approach to the Psychiatric Assessment: A Randomized Trial of a Novel Interviewing Technique.

Alan Schlechter, Michael Moerdler-Green, Sondra Zabar, Aaron Reliford, Antonia New, Jordyn H Feingold, Fei Guo, Sarah Horwitz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alan SchlechterNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. alan.schlechter@nyulangone.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-7693
Michael Moerdler-GreenNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sondra ZabarNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron RelifordNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Antonia NewIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jordyn H FeingoldIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Fei GuoNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah HorwitzNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis pilot study compared a novel communication strategy, the positive approach to the psychiatric interview, with the traditional approach to see if the positive approach can be taught to psychiatric residents; reproduced with standardized patients; measured with a structured scale, the "Positive Approach Outcome Measure," by blinded raters; and used to improve rapport (assessed with the Bond score), a key driver of engagement.

methodsThirty psychiatric residents were randomly assigned to conduct two psychiatric interviews with standardized patients. The standardized patients completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised, an assessment of the therapeutic alliance. T tests and linear regression examined the effect of the training on the outcome of interest, the Bond score.

resultsThe Bond scores for the positive approach group (M = 19.27, SD = 2.87) and the traditional approach group (M = 16.90, SD = 3.44) were statistically significantly different (p = 0.05). All residents trained in the positive approach received a positive score on the Positive Approach Outcome Measure while none of the traditional approach-trained residents attained the threshold. The inter-rater reliability for the blinded raters was high (0.857), as was the intra-rater reliability (1.0).

conclusionsThe positive approach can be taught to residents and reproduced consistently and was associated with improvement in a key driver of treatment engagement: rapport. The positive approach may be an important, inexpensive intervention to improve treatment engagement and ultimately treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyHumansPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsAcademic psychiatryAssessment and interviewingDisparitiesEducationTreatment discontinuation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.