ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023
Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of primary intracranial angiosarcomas.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatments and outcomes of primary and metastatic spinal angiosarcoma patients: study of 29 consecutive cases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Review
- A patient with primary intracranial granuloma with difficulty in differential diagnosis: A case report and literature review.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrimary intracranial angiosarcomas (PIAs) are exceedingly uncommon, with the literature predominantly comprising case reports. The clinical characteristics and prognosis of this condition remain elusive. Our objective is to describe the clinical characteristics and surgical prognosis of this rare disease while offering insights into the most effective contemporary treatment strategy.
methodsThe authors of this article incorporated a cohort of 28 cases of PIAs, consisting of 3 from our institution and 25 from previously documented literature sources. Subsequently, we conducted both Cox univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the potential risk factors influencing overall survival (OS).
resultsThe cohort include 19 males and 9 females with a mean age of 39.6 ± 23.5 years (range: 0.03-73 years). Radiologically, 24 cases were located at supratentorial area, while only 4 cases were located at infratentorial area. 17 cases underwent gross total resection (GTR), and 11 cases underwent Non-GTR. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to 17 cases, and postoperative chemotherapy was administered to 6 cases. After a mean follow-up time of 21.5 ± 26.4 months, 19 (67.9%) patients died. The 1-year, 2-year, 5-year OS is 55.3%, 50.7% and 24.6%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Non-GTR was the sole factor predicting a shorter OS (p = 0.004).
conclusionIn this study, we found that PIAs have a higher incidence in males than in females, and most cases show evidence of old hemorrhage on preoperative MRI. Through our statistical analysis, GTR plays a crucial role in for treating this rare disease. Further clinical data are needed to validate our conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.