Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37650937›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Metal ion release after hip resurfacing arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of one hundred ninety-five cases.

S Lukas, P Martinot, S Putman, A Lons, E Drumez, H Migaud, J Girard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S LukasUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 4490-PMOI, F-59000, Lille, France. sp.lukas21@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1639-146X
P MartinotDépartement de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Université Catholique de Lille, Lomme, France.
S PutmanUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 4490-PMOI, F-59000, Lille, France.
A LonsDépartement de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Université Catholique de Lille, Lomme, France.
E DrumezUnité de Biostatistiques, Université Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, EA 2694-Santé publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, F-59000, Lille, France.
H MigaudUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 4490-PMOI, F-59000, Lille, France.
J GirardUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 4490-PMOI, F-59000, Lille, France.
Université de Lille · FRUniversité Catholique de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings like hip resurfacing results in the release of metallic ions. In parallel, like every metallic implant, knee arthroplasty implants undergo passive corrosion. We analyzed blood levels of cobalt and chromium ions in patients who have a hip resurfacing arthroplasty and compared them to patients who have undergone knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of one year. The hypothesis was that there is no difference in the ion release between hip resurfacing and knee arthroplasty.

methodsSixty-three patients who underwent knee arthroplasty were compared to a cohort of 132 patients who underwent hip resurfacing. The blood levels of cobalt and chromium ions were determined preoperatively and at six and 12 months postoperatively and then compared between groups. We analyzed the relationship between ion release and the change in clinical outcome scores (Harris Hip score, Oxford Hip score, Merle D'Aubigné Postel score, Oxford Knee score, International Knee Society score), the BMI, sex, physical activity, implant size and inclination of the acetabular implant (hip resurfacing patients only). Mixed linear models were used to assess the changes in ion blood levels over time.

resultsThe cobalt blood levels were higher in the first 6 months in the resurfacing group (0.87 ug/L vs 0.67 ug/L; p = 0.011), while it was higher in the knee arthroplasty group at 12 months (1.20 ug/L vs 1.41 ug/L; p = 0.0008). There were no significant differences in chromium levels during the follow-up period.

conclusionThe increase in metal ion release after knee arthroplasty is as high as after hip resurfacing at the one year follow-up. The monitoring of this parameter probably should not be recommended in case of good clinicals outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHip ProsthesisChromiumCobaltHumansIonsMetalsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesChromiumCobaltIonsMetalsKnee arthroplastyMetal ionsTotal hip resurfacingTotal joint replacement

Identifiers

PMID37650937
OpenAlexW4386305136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.