Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37650922›Full record

ReviewRheumatology international2023

Experience with abatacept in refractory lupus nephritis.

Emma Calatayud, Marco Montomoli, Ana Ávila, Asunción Sancho Calabuig, Juan José Alegre-Sancho

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Refractory lupus nephritis: national multicenter study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma CalatayudHospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain. caem@alumni.uv.es.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-7290
Marco MontomoliHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-6352
Ana ÁvilaHospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Asunción Sancho CalabuigHospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4170-9003
Juan José Alegre-SanchoHospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1641-0875
Universitat de València · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional induction treatment have been tested in randomized clinical trials with heterogeneous results. Like many others biologic therapies, Abatacept has not shown a clear benefit in the context of clinical trials. We present two cases of lupus nephritis patients in whom addition of abatacept resulted in complete remission of the renal disease. The first case described a 49-year-old male with class IV lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria and high immunological activity refractory to conventional treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids and multitarget therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Several biological therapies (rituximab, belimumab and tocilizumab) were unsuccessfully tried, so that abatacept was added to his background multitarget therapy showing complete clinical response. The second case described a 52-year-old female with class IV lupus nephritis treated initially with conventional treatment with partial response. In successive renal flares with nephrotic proteinuria, she showed intolerance to rituximab and refractoriness to voclosporin. Finally, abatacept was added to her background therapy with MMF and PDN showing complete and maintained remission of the disease. In no case the use of abatacept was associated with serious adverse events. Based on our experience, abatacept should be considered as a safe rescue therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis and proteinuria with nephrotic range. In addition to this case, we reviewed the use of abatacept in lupus nephritis in the literature.

Indexed as

AbataceptImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus NephritisDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAbataceptImmunosuppressive AgentsAbataceptBiologic therapyCTLA-4-IgLupus nephritis

Identifiers

PMID37650922
PMCPMC10587212
OpenAlexW4386305690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.