ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Contemporary imaging examinations for (suspected) stress fractures].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress fractures belong to the group of atraumatic fractures. A low-impact and repetitive load is the underlying cause and no fracture would occur under physiological circumstances. The conventional X‑ray examination remains the initial imaging modality when a stress fracture is suspected. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard and is also used to rule out other pathological changes. Computed tomography (CT) should be included if the MRI findings are unclear. New techniques, such as dual energy computed tomography (DECT) and magnetic resonance bone imaging (MR bone) should be used more frequently in practice in the future and become increasingly more important for the correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.