Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37650099›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Non-invasive stimulation reveals ventromedial prefrontal cortex function in reward prediction and reward processing.

Maimu Alissa Rehbein, Thomas Kroker, Constantin Winker, Lena Ziehfreund, Anna Reschke, Jens Bölte, Miroslaw Wyczesany, Kati Roesmann, Ida Wessing, Markus Junghöfer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Distributed Subcortical Integration of Reward and Threat May Inform Subsequent Approach-Avoidance Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maimu Alissa Rehbein *Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thomas Kroker *Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Constantin WinkerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Lena ZiehfreundInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Anna ReschkeInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jens BölteOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Miroslaw WyczesanyInstitute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Kati RoesmannInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Ida WessingInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Markus JunghöferInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Münster · DEJagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Siegen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Studies suggest an involvement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in reward prediction and processing, with reward-based learning relying on neural activity in response to unpredicted rewards or non-rewards (reward prediction error, RPE). Here, we investigated the causal role of the vmPFC in reward prediction, processing, and RPE signaling by transiently modulating vmPFC excitability using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Methods: Participants received excitatory or inhibitory tDCS of the vmPFC before completing a gambling task, in which cues signaled varying reward probabilities and symbols provided feedback on monetary gain or loss. We collected self-reported and evaluative data on reward prediction and processing. In addition, cue-locked and feedback-locked neural activity via magnetoencephalography (MEG) and pupil diameter using eye-tracking were recorded. Results: Regarding reward prediction (cue-locked analysis), vmPFC excitation (versus inhibition) resulted in increased prefrontal activation preceding loss predictions, increased pupil dilations, and tentatively more optimistic reward predictions. Regarding reward processing (feedback-locked analysis), vmPFC excitation (versus inhibition) resulted in increased pleasantness, increased vmPFC activation, especially for unpredicted gains (i.e., gain RPEs), decreased perseveration in choice behavior after negative feedback, and increased pupil dilations. Discussion: Our results support the pivotal role of the vmPFC in reward prediction and processing. Furthermore, they suggest that transient vmPFC excitation via tDCS induces a positive bias into the reward system that leads to enhanced anticipation and appraisal of positive outcomes and improves reward-based learning, as indicated by greater behavioral flexibility after losses and unpredicted outcomes, which can be seen as an improved reaction to the received feedback.

Indexed as

magnetoencephalographyprediction errorreward predictionreward processingtranscranial direct current stimulationventromedial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID37650099
PMCPMC10465130
OpenAlexW4385858170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.