ArticleERJ open research2023
Causal analysis between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and obstructive sleep apnoea.
Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Based on evidence from existing observational research, clarifying the causal relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is challenging. Here, Mendelian randomisation, a method based on genetics, was used to provide new evidence for causality. Methods: Summary statistics from two publicly available genome-wide association studies were used to evaluate the causal relationship between GORD and OSA (the GORD database was used as an exposure variable and the OSA database as an outcome). Inverse variance weighting was used as the main analytical tool in Mendelian randomisation to estimate causal effects. The robustness of the results was evaluated by sensitivity analysis. Possible mediators were evaluated using multivariate Mendelian randomisation. Results: A statistically significant causal relationship was observed between GORD and OSA (OR 1.597, 95% CI 1.401-1.821, p<0.001), and similar results were observed in weighted median and Mendelian randomisation-Egger regression analyses. No bias was found in the sensitivity analysis of Mendelian randomisation estimation. Multivariate Mendelian randomisation showed that GORD significantly increased the risk of developing OSA, even when the possible mediator was excluded (OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.101-1.212, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study confirmed a causal relationship between GORD and OSA and suggests that intervention measures should be taken for patients with GORD to prevent the occurrence of OSA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.