ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023
A Health State Utility Study to Elicit Societal Values Associated with Pulmonary Hypertension.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selection of patient-reported outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials: a systematic review, meta-analysis and health-related quality of life framework.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Subjective Rationalities of Nonadherence to Treatment and Vaccination in Healthcare Decision-Making.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare, severe, and progressive pulmonary vascular disease, which includes five subgroups with similar presentation. Symptoms include dyspnea, and fatigue, and can significantly impact one's health-related quality of life (HRQL). Although treatments are mainly medical, PH group 4, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), can be managed with procedures, ie pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Currently, drugs in Europe are only approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and CTEPH therefore the aim of this study was to elicit novel societal health state utilities in the UK for PAH and CTEPH based on disease severity, functional class (FC), clinical events, and treatment procedures specifically for CTEPH. Material and Methods: Six health states were defined: World Health Organization (WHO)-FC II, WHO-FC III, and WHO-FC IV [defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA)]; PH-related hospitalization; and "BPA procedure and recovery" and "PEA surgery and recovery". Health states were based on a targeted literature review and two rounds of interviews with clinical experts (N = 4) and patients (N = 6). Draft health states were validated in cognitive debriefing interviews with clinical experts (N = 3). Health states were valued by the UK general public (n = 200), using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) assessment with the lead time method. Results: The mean TTO values/utilities were 0.81 (FC II), 0.80 (BPA), 0.78 (PEA), 0.59 (FC III), 0.28 (FC IV), and 0.25 (PH-related hospitalization). Each progression in FC was associated with worse TTO scores. Conclusion: This study reports societal utility values for PAH and CTEPH in the UK. It provides first utility estimates for states such as BPA procedure and recovery, PEA surgery and recovery and PH-related hospitalization for this population. The results show important distinctions between FC, treatment procedures, and hospitalization, and the significant burden of disease on HRQL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.