Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37650026›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2022

An overview of synthetic administrative data for research.

Theodora Kokosi, Bianca De Stavola, Robin Mitra, Lora Frayling, Aiden Doherty, Iain Dove, Pam Sonnenberg, Katie Harron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data Synthesis Reinvented: Preserving Missing Patterns for Enhanced Analysis.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A review of synthetic data terminology for privacy preserving use cases.International journal of population data science · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. HydraGAN: A Cooperative Agent Model for Multi-Objective Data Generation.ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review.International journal of population data science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theodora KokosiDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Bianca De StavolaDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Robin MitraSchool of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Cardiff UK.
Lora FraylingHealth Data Insight, UK.
Aiden DohertyBig Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Iain DoveOffice for National Statistics, Titchfield, UK.
Pam SonnenbergDepartment of Infection & Population Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Katie HarronDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/3/34214British Heart Foundation SP/18/4/33803Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of administrative data for research and for planning services has increased over recent decades due to the value of the large, rich information available. However, concerns about the release of sensitive or personal data and the associated disclosure risk can lead to lengthy approval processes and restricted data access. This can delay or prevent the production of timely evidence. A promising solution to facilitate more efficient data access is to create synthetic versions of the original datasets which are less likely to hold confidential information and can minimise disclosure risk. Such data may be used as an interim solution, allowing researchers to develop their analysis plans on non-disclosive data, whilst waiting for access to the real data. We aim to provide an overview of the background and uses of synthetic data and describe common methods used to generate synthetic data in the context of UK administrative research. We propose a simplified terminology for categories of synthetic data (univariate, multivariate, and complex modality synthetic data) as well as a more comprehensive description of the terminology used in the existing literature and illustrate challenges and future directions for research.

Indexed as

DisclosureResearch PersonnelHumansadministrative datasetsdata confidentialitydata linkagedata utilitystatistical disclosure controlsynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID37650026
PMCPMC10464868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.