Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37650003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2023

Psychological and Physiological Responses Across Six Weeks of HIIT and MICT in Previously Inactive, Young Adults.

Emily R Dunston, Katrina Taylor

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily R DunstonDepartment of Wellness and Movement Sciences, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA, USA.
Katrina TaylorDepartment of Wellness and Movement Sciences, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA, USA.
Eastern Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is suggested as a public health strategy to increase engagement in, and adherence to, physical activity. However, debate exists regarding the efficacy in inactive individuals. PURPOSE: To determine the physiological and psychological responses to three weeks of supervised and three weeks of unsupervised HIIT or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in previously inactive adults.

methodsYoung adults (

resultsMaximal oxygen consumption (Δ 2.8 ml·kg

conclusionsCardiorespiratory fitness improved comparably for HIIT and MICT but with a shorter time commitment for HIIT. Perceived competence increased across supervised training suggesting it may be important to provide support at the beginning of an exercise intervention.

Indexed as

Exercise enjoymentintermittent exerciseperceptual responsesVO2max

Identifiers

PMID37650003
PMCPMC10464759
OpenAlexW4386306285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.