ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Inpainting surgical occlusion from laparoscopic video sequences for robot-assisted interventions.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of deep learning for surgical instrument segmentation, detection and tracking in minimally invasive surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Medical technology for minimally invasive surgery has undergone a paradigm shift with the introduction of robot-assisted surgery. However, it is very difficult to track the position of the surgical tools in a surgical scene, so it is crucial to accurately detect and identify surgical tools. This task can be aided by deep learning-based semantic segmentation of surgical video frames. Furthermore, due to the limited working and viewing areas of these surgical instruments, there is a higher chance of complications from tissue injuries (e.g., tissue scars and tears). Approach: With the aid of digital inpainting algorithms, we present an application that uses image segmentation to remove surgical instruments from laparoscopic/endoscopic video. We employ a modified U-Net architecture (U-NetPlus) to segment the surgical instruments. It consists of a redesigned decoder and a pre-trained VGG11 or VGG16 encoder. The decoder was modified by substituting an up-sampling operation based on nearest-neighbor interpolation for the transposed convolution operation. Furthermore, these interpolation weights do not need to be learned to perform upsampling, which eliminates the artifacts generated by the transposed convolution. In addition, we use a very fast and adaptable data augmentation technique to further enhance performance. The instrument segmentation mask is filled in (i.e., inpainted) by the tool removal algorithms using the previously acquired tool segmentation masks and either previous instrument-containing frames or instrument-free reference frames. Results: We have shown the effectiveness of the proposed surgical tool segmentation/removal algorithms on a robotic instrument dataset from the MICCAI 2015 and 2017 EndoVis Challenge. We report a 90.20% DICE for binary segmentation, a 76.26% DICE for instrument part segmentation, and a 46.07% DICE for instrument type (i.e., all instruments) segmentation on the MICCAI 2017 challenge dataset using our U-NetPlus architecture, outperforming the results of earlier techniques used and tested on these data. In addition, we demonstrated the successful execution of the tool removal algorithm from surgical tool-free videos that contained moving surgical tools that were generated artificially. Conclusions: Our application successfully separates and eliminates the surgical tool to reveal a view of the background tissue that was otherwise hidden by the tool, producing results that are visually similar to the actual data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.