Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649873›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

Efficiency of the Guide Extension Catheter-Facilitated Tip-in Technique in the Recanalization of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion.

You Zhou, Lixiang Deng, Zhe Wang, Yiqing Hu, Zhangwei Chen, Hao Lu, Juying Qian, Junbo Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

You Zhou *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Lixiang Deng *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Zhe Wang *Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Yiqing HuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Zhangwei ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Hao LuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Juying QianDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Junbo GeDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Zhongshan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNShanghai Clinical Research Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The tip-in technique, which involves advancing an antegrade microcatheter cross the lesion over a retrograde guidewire, is an elaborated maneuver in the recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO). We seek to assess the efficiency of a guide extension catheter-facilitated tip-in technique in comparison to the traditional retrograde approach, which is accomplished by an externalization wire. Methods: Thirty-three CTO patients successfully revascularized using guide extension catheter-facilitated "tip-in" were included and matched with another 33 patients by J-CTO score and operators, whose CTO was recanalized using an externalized wire. The manipulation time from the first retrograde wire entering the antegrade guide to the first antegrade balloon inflation in the occlusion was calculated. Results: Compared with the wire-externalization group, the manipulation time in the tip-in group was significantly shortened [389s; interquartile range (IQR), 272-478 vs 706s; IQR, 560-914; p < 0.001]. There was a trend in decreasing total operation time and radiation dose, but it did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Guide extension catheter-facilitated tip-in is an efficient method to achieve the recanalization of CTO in a retrograde way, which would be pivotal when the retrograde microcatheter could not be advanced into the antegrade guide catheter.

Indexed as

chronic total occlusionextension guide catheterretrogradetip-in

Identifiers

PMID37649873
PMCPMC10464828
OpenAlexW4386170062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.