ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Comparing Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Units and General Wards: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Streamlining postprocedural care after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Analysis of Influencing Factors of Junior ICU Nurses' Recognition and Response Abilities to Clinical Deterioration: A Cross-Sectional Study.Critical care research and practice · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a new predictive model for in-hospital postoperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after general anesthesia in nonagenarians undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive Scoring Methods for Postoperative Level of Care Needs in the Geriatric Hip Fracture Patient Population.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Shock epidemiology and outcomes among internal medicine patients.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The admission of critically ill patients to intensive care unit (ICU) plays a crucial role in reducing mortality. However, the scarcity of available ICU beds presents a significant challenge. In resource-limited settings, the outcomes of critically ill patients, particularly those who are not accepted for ICU admission, have been a topic of ongoing debate and contention. Objective: This study aimed to explore the outcomes and factors associated with ICU admission and mortality among critically ill patients in Thailand. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled critically ill adults indicated for medical ICU admission. Patients were followed for 28 days regardless of whether they were admitted to an ICU. Data on mortality, hospital length of stay, duration of organ support, and factors associated with mortality and ICU admission were collected. Results: Of the 180 patients enrolled, 72 were admitted to ICUs, and 108 were cared for in general wards. The ICU group had a higher 28-day mortality rate (44.4% vs 20.4%; Conclusion: Among patients indicated for ICU admission, those who were admitted had a higher 28-day mortality rate. Higher mortality was associated with alteration of consciousness and vasopressor use. Patients who were sicker and had higher BMI were more likely to be admitted to an ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.