Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649821›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2023

Assessment of the outcomes and stability after mandibular incisor extraction in orthodontic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rasiga Gandhi, Poornima Jnaneshwar, Keerthi Venkatesan, Davis Devasahayam, Krishnaraj Rajaram, Rajia Mohamed Azharudeen, Kavichithraa Jothy

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rasiga GandhiDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-3734
Poornima JnaneshwarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-5843
Keerthi VenkatesanDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Faculty of Dental sciences, SRIHER, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9203-0511
Davis DevasahayamDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-5887
Krishnaraj RajaramDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-2511
Rajia Mohamed AzharudeenOrthodontist, Private Practice, Kadayanallur, Tenkasi, Tamilnadu, India.
Kavichithraa JothyDepartment of Orthodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College & Hospital, Melmaruvathur, Chengalpattu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-3505
SRM Dental College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the stability of the outcomes after mandibular incisor extraction (MIE) using intercanine width and peer assessment rating (PAR) scores in orthodontic patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Ovid, and SciELO were systematically searched without restrictions until August 2022. A risk of bias assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to assess the quality of evidence. Random effects meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software. Results: Seven retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Meta-analysis identified a statistically significant reduction in intercanine width with MIE after the retention period. The mean difference in post-retention changes concerning intercanine width (MD=0.14, 95% CI: -2.17-1.89; Conclusion: With the existing retrospective studies of limited evidence, treatment outcomes with MIE were found to show good improvements in PAR scores. Some reduction in the intercanine width was evident after the retention period, which was observed even with the other two treatment modalities that were compared. Hence, with careful evaluation, MIE could be considered a valid treatment option.

Indexed as

Intercanine widthMandibular incisor extractionOrthodontic patientsPAR indexRelapseStability

Identifiers

PMID37649821
PMCPMC10462469
OpenAlexW4385158736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.