Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649773›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023

Improvement of quality of life in a family of a child with asthma after using the Written Asthma Action Plan (WAAP).

Eshita Bansal, Shuchi Mehra, Kapil Bhalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eshita BansalDepartment of Paediatrics, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Shuchi MehraDepartment of Paediatrics, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Kapil BhallaDepartment of Paediatrics, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a common childhood disease that leads to impairment of quality of life (QOL) of both the children affected by the disease and their caregivers. Management of asthma includes pharmacotherapy along with education about asthma and its self-management, which is most often given verbally. There is limited evidence regarding the benefits of using a written asthma action plan (WAAP) that has been improved using pictorial representation. Objective: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a WAAP in improving the QOL of children with bronchial asthma and also of their caregivers. It also educates the patients and families about various triggers and danger signs of an acute attack of asthma. Methods: This was an interventional study with the aim of improving the quality of asthma management. Children of age group 7-17 years in whom the diagnosis of asthma was made and those parents and children who could read and answer the questionnaire (mini-PAQLQ and PACQLQ) were included in the study. Subjects were randomized into Case and Control groups. The intervention was to give the randomly selected patients (Case group) an individualized WAAP along with standard asthma care to both groups. Both groups were followed up to assess and record variations in the quality of life. Results: The Conclusion: On being provided with the WAAP, the frequency of acute asthma events, treatment compliance, and QOL improved. There was a significant increase in the primary outcomes-PAQLQ and PACQLQ scores. Significant improvement in the secondary outcomes-number of missed school days, missed doses of controller medication, need for rescue medication, and ACT score was also observed.

Indexed as

Asthma action planPACQLQpaediatric asthmaPAQLQ

Identifiers

PMID37649773
PMCPMC10465022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.