Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649640›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric chemistry and physics2021

Improved representation of the global dust cycle using observational constraints on dust properties and abundance.

Jasper F Kok, Adeyemi A Adebiyi, Samuel Albani, Yves Balkanski, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Mian Chin, Peter R Colarco, Douglas S Hamilton, Yue Huang, Akinori Ito and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Supersaturation, Nucleation, and Phase Separation of Mesoscopic Systems.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jasper F KokDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Adeyemi A AdebiyiDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Samuel AlbaniDepartment of Environmental and Earth Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Yves BalkanskiLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ-UPSaclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ramiro Checa-GarciaLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ-UPSaclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Mian ChinAtmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA.
Peter R ColarcoAtmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA.
Douglas S HamiltonDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Yue HuangDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Akinori ItoYokohama Institute for Earth Sciences, JAMSTEC, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0001, Japan.
Martina KloseBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Danny M LeungDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Longlei LiDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Natalie M MahowaldDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Ron L MillerNASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York NY10025 USA.
Vincenzo ObisoBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Pérez García-PandoBarcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Adriana Rocha-LimaPhysics Department, UMBC, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jessica S WanDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Chloe A WhickerDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Funding

UCLA MSD ProgramR25GM055052 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BARBER, PAUL HENRY, HASSON, TAMA W. · 1996 to 2021
$9.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM055052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol by mass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accurately represent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors are partially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission in coarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysical properties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodology that yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We present an analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensemble of global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol optical depth. We then compare the inverse model results against independent measurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find that errors are reduced by approximately a factor of two relative to current model simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse model results show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere, most likely because both the model simulations and the observational constraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis, we find that the emission flux of dust with geometric diameter up to 20 μm (PM

Identifiers

PMID37649640
PMCPMC10466066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.