ArticleJournal of pain research2023
Head and Neck Cancer-Related Pain: A Descriptive Analysis of the Pain Phenotypes.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence and characteristics of persistent pain among head and neck cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2025Pooled it
- Technical guideline for intra-prepontine cisternal drug delivery via spinal puncture through subarachnoid catheterization.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Guideline
- Risk factors and development of a predictive nomogram model for acute postoperative pain in oral cancer.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Experiences of Physiotherapists Treating Trismus in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Findings from a Spanish Web-Based Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Painful Realities: Navigating the Complexities of Head and Neck Cancer Pain.Oral diseases · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of Clinical Features and Mechanisms of Orofacial Pain and Headache in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and prevalence of different painful phenotypes in head and neck cancer (HNC)-related pain. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients who presented with HNC-related pain. All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical assessment and were stratified in one or more painful phenotypes constructed based on the International Classification for Orofacial Pain, first edition, and International Classification for Headache Disorders, third edition. Results: Among the participants included, 68% were male, and the mean age of the cohort was 49.71 ± 14.14 years. The most prevalent cancer sites were the tongue (29%) and buccal mucosa (24%). The average pain intensity was 5.88 ± 2.53 on an 11-point numeric verbal pain rating scale, where 0 was indicative of "no pain" and 10 was suggestive of "worst pain imaginable". However, the worst pain intensity over the last month was 8.95 ± 1.53. The average number of pain sites per patient was 6, and the most common pain descriptors were dull ache, burning, and sharpness. Myofascial pain, jaw bone pain, and burning pain disorder were the most common phenotypes, and on average, three different phenotypes co-existed. Conclusion: HNC-related pain has a varying and complex clinical profile, which may mirror the pain profiles of primary pain disorders, such as myofascial pain, jaw bone pain, or burning pain disorders, and often presents together as a cluster of phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.