Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649606›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2023

Applications of injectable hemostatic materials in wound healing: principles, strategies, performance requirements, and future perspectives.

Hong Wang, Liang Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Lipid Microspheres for Topical Delivery of Norfloxacin: Development and Evaluation.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Applications of Hydrogels in Emergency Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Application of photo-crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl in wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hong WangSchool of Physics and Electronic Information, Yan'an University, Yan'an, 716000, China.
Liang YangSchool of Physics and Electronic Information, Yan'an University, Yan'an, 716000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncontrolled traumatic bleeding can lead to death due to excessive blood loss within minutes. Early intervention is crucial to save lives, making timely and effective hemostasis is a major global challenge. Injectable hemostatic materials (IHMs) have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of hemostasis, facilitate wound healing, and enhance survival rates in emergency situations. The superior hemostatic performance of IHMs has garnered significant attention. However, there are relatively few comprehensive reviews on IHMs. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the latest research progress on IHMs in recent years. Firstly, the physiological hemostatic process and the underlying principles of hemostasis are analyzed. Subsequently, the synthesis strategies for different IHMs are discussed. The performance requirements of IHMs are then summarized, including high efficiency, biocompatibility, degradability, manipulability, stability and antibacterial ability. Finally, the development prospects and challenges of IHMs are presented. This review serves as a necessary and systematic summary of IHMs, providing a valuable reference for the development of new high-performance hemostatic materials and their practical clinical applications.

Indexed as

HemostaticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHemostasisWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsHemostaticsFibrinogenHemostasisInjectablePlateletSynthetic strategy

Identifiers

PMID37649606
PMCPMC10465227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.