Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Monitoring biosecurity in poultry production: an overview of databases reporting biosecurity compliance from seven European countries.

Mattias Delpont, Luis G Salazar, Jeroen Dewulf, Artur Zbikowski, Piotr Szeleszczuk, Anne-Christine Dufay-Lefort, Nathalie Rousset, Annick Spaans, Arthi Amalraj, Giuditta Tilli and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Strategic Detection ofBiosensors · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mattias DelpontIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Luis G SalazarIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Jeroen DewulfDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Artur ZbikowskiDepartment of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr SzeleszczukDepartment of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Anne-Christine Dufay-LefortITAVI, Institut Technique de l'Aviculture, Pisciculture et Cuniculture, Paris, France.
Nathalie RoussetITAVI, Institut Technique de l'Aviculture, Pisciculture et Cuniculture, Paris, France.
Annick SpaansSouthern Agriculture and Horticulture Organization, Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Arthi AmalrajDepartment of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Giuditta TilliDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy.
Alessandra PiccirilloDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy.
Aitor DevesaCentro de Calidad Avícola y Alimentación Animal de la Comunidad Valenciana (CECAV), Castellón, Spain.
Sandra Sevilla-NavarroCentro de Calidad Avícola y Alimentación Animal de la Comunidad Valenciana (CECAV), Castellón, Spain.
Hilde van MeirhaegeVetworks BV, Aalter, Belgium.
László KovácsDepartment of Animal Hygiene, Herd Health and Mobile Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos Bernard JóźwiakDigital Food Chain Education, Research, Development and Innovation Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Jean-Luc GuérinIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Mathilde C PaulIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compliance with required on-farm biosecurity practices reduces the risk of contamination and spread of zoonotic and economically important diseases. With repeating avian influenza epidemics in the poultry industry, the need to monitor and improve the overall level of biosecurity is increasing. In practice, biosecurity compliance is assessed by various actors (e.g., academic, private and public institutions), and the results of such assessments may be recorded and gathered in databases which are seldom shared or thoroughly analyzed. This study aimed to provide an inventory of databases related to the assessment of biosecurity in poultry farms in seven major poultry-producing European countries to highlight challenges and opportunities associated with biosecurity data collection, sharing, and use. The institutions in charge of these databases were contacted and interviewed using a structured questionnaire to gather information on the main characteristics of the databases and the context of their implementation. A total of 20 databases were identified, covering the gamut of poultry species and production types. Most databases were linked to veterinary health authorities or academia, and to a lesser extent interbranch organizations. Depending on the institutions in charge, the databases serve various purposes, from providing advice to enforcing regulations. The quality of the biosecurity data collected is believed to be quite reliable, as biosecurity is mostly assessed by trained farm advisors or official veterinarians and during a farm visit. Some of the databases are difficult to analyze and/or do not offer information concerning which biosecurity measures are most or least respected. Moreover, some key biosecurity practices are sometimes absent from certain databases. Although the databases serve a variety of purposes and cover different production types, each with specific biosecurity features, their analysis should help to improve the surveillance of biosecurity in the poultry sector and provide evidence on the benefits of biosecurity.

Indexed as

auditsavian influenzabroilersegg layerspreventionsurveillanceturkeys

Identifiers

PMID37649565
PMCPMC10465163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.