ArticleIEEE sensors journal2023
The effect of biomechanical features on classification of dual-task gait.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of an extemporaneous speech dual-task on center of pressure displacement and velocity in older adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Multi-sensor Gait Dataset Collected Under Non-standardized Dual-Task Conditions.Scientific data · 2025Article
- EM-COGLOAD: An investigation into age and cognitive load detection using eye tracking and deep learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Comparative study of the effects of custom-made insole and ordinary insole in adults with flexible flatfoot on different slopes.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (ADRD) has been a focus of research with the hope that early intervention may improve clinical outcomes. The manifestation of motor impairment in early stages of ADRD has led to the inclusion of gait assessments including spatiotemporal parameters in clinical evaluations. This study aims to determine the effect of adding kinetic and kinematic gait features to classification of different levels of cognitive load in healthy individuals. A dual-task paradigm was used to simulate cognitive impairment in 40 healthy adults, with single-task walking trials representing normal, healthy gait. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task was administered at two different inter-stimulus intervals representing two levels of cognitive load in dual-task gait. We predicted that a richer dataset would improve classification accuracy relative to spatiotemporal parameters. Repeated Measures ANOVA showed significant changes in 15 different gait features across all three levels of cognitive load. We used three supervised machine learning algorithms to classify data points using a series of different gait feature sets with performance based on the area under the curve (AUC). Classification yielded 0.778 AUC across all three conditions (0.889 AUC Single vs. Dual) using kinematic and spatiotemporal features compared to 0.724 AUC using spatiotemporal features only (0.792 AUC Single vs. Dual). These data suggest that additional kinematic parameters improve classification performance. However, the benefit of measuring a wider set of parameters compared to their cost needs consideration. Further work will lead to a clinically viable ADRD detection classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.