Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649489›Full record

ArticleIEEE sensors journal2023

The effect of biomechanical features on classification of dual-task gait.

Mark Chiarello, Jeonghwan Lee, Mandy Salinas, Robin Hilsabeck, Jarrod Lewis-Peacock, James Sulzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative study of the effects of custom-made insole and ordinary insole in adults with flexible flatfoot on different slopes.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark ChiarelloWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
Jeonghwan LeeWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
Mandy SalinasDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
Robin HilsabeckDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Comprehensive Memory Center within the Mulva Clinic for the Neurosciences, UT Health Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
Jarrod Lewis-PeacockDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
James SulzerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA.

Funding

Combining neurophysiology and biomechanics to delineate post-stroke gait impairmentsR01HD100416 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SULZER, JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (ADRD) has been a focus of research with the hope that early intervention may improve clinical outcomes. The manifestation of motor impairment in early stages of ADRD has led to the inclusion of gait assessments including spatiotemporal parameters in clinical evaluations. This study aims to determine the effect of adding kinetic and kinematic gait features to classification of different levels of cognitive load in healthy individuals. A dual-task paradigm was used to simulate cognitive impairment in 40 healthy adults, with single-task walking trials representing normal, healthy gait. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task was administered at two different inter-stimulus intervals representing two levels of cognitive load in dual-task gait. We predicted that a richer dataset would improve classification accuracy relative to spatiotemporal parameters. Repeated Measures ANOVA showed significant changes in 15 different gait features across all three levels of cognitive load. We used three supervised machine learning algorithms to classify data points using a series of different gait feature sets with performance based on the area under the curve (AUC). Classification yielded 0.778 AUC across all three conditions (0.889 AUC Single vs. Dual) using kinematic and spatiotemporal features compared to 0.724 AUC using spatiotemporal features only (0.792 AUC Single vs. Dual). These data suggest that additional kinematic parameters improve classification performance. However, the benefit of measuring a wider set of parameters compared to their cost needs consideration. Further work will lead to a clinically viable ADRD detection classifier.

Indexed as

Cognitive DeclineCognitive loadDual-taskGaitMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37649489
PMCPMC10465111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.