ArticleJVS-vascular science2023
Comparison of arterial storage conditions for delayed arterial ring testing.
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Arterial ring testing is the gold standard for measuring arterial function. Increased arterial tone through arterial contraction and impaired endothelial relaxation (endothelial dysfunction) are key metrics of impaired arterial health in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). To allow for comparative testing of arteries during standard laboratory hours, storage buffers and conditions have been used to extend the functional life of arteries. Various storage conditions have been compared, but there has not been a robust comparison or validation in human arteries. The objective of this work is to optimize storage of arterial segments for endothelial cell (EC) testing in a murine model and to test EC function in human PAD arteries. We hypothesized that certain storage conditions would be superior to others. Methods: Healthy murine aortas were harvested from 10- to 14-week-old C57/Bl6J male and female mice and compared under different storage protocols (24 hours) to immediate arterial testing. The storage conditions tested were: Opti-MEM (37°C or 4°C), Krebs-HEPES with 1.8 mmol/L or 2.5 mmol/L calcium (4°C), or Wisconsin (WI) solution at 4°C. Vascular function was evaluated by isometric force testing. Endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxation were measured after precontraction with addition of methacholine or sodium nitroprusside, respectively. Arterial contraction was stimulated with potassium chloride or phenylephrine. Analysis of variance was used to determine significance compared with immediate testing with Results: We found that 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM best preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and performed similarly to immediately testing aortas (termed fresh for freshly tested) ( Conclusions: In healthy murine aortas, arterial storage for 24 hours in 4°C WI or 37°C Opti-MEM both preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and maximum force of contraction. In human PAD arteries stored in 4° WI, flow conditions before arterial harvest, but not arterial calcification, led to differences in arterial relaxation in human PAD arteries. Arterial contractility was more robust (11/28 arteries) compared with arterial relaxation (7/28 arteries), but was not significantly different under flow or calcification parameters. This work defines ideal storage conditions for arterial ring testing and identifies that EC dysfunction from disturbed flow may persist in delayed ex vivo arterial testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.