Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649469›Full record

ArticleAnimal behaviour2022

Beetle iridescence induces an avoidance response in naïve avian predators.

Karin Kjernsmo, Anna M Lim, Rox Middleton, Joanna R Hall, Leah M Costello, Heather M Whitney, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel, Innes C Cuthill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Interactions between color and gloss in iridescent camouflage.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  4. Dazzled by shine: gloss as an antipredator strategy in fast moving prey.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  5. How does viewing angle affect the perceived accuracy of Batesian mimicry in hoverflies?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karin KjernsmoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Anna M LimSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Rox MiddletonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Joanna R HallSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Leah M CostelloSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Heather M WhitneySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Nicholas E Scott-SamuelSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
Innes C CuthillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has recently been found that iridescence, a taxonomically widespread form of animal coloration defined by a change in hue with viewing angle, can act as a highly effective form of camouflage. However, little is known about whether iridescence can confer a survival benefit to prey postdetection and, if so, which optical properties of iridescent prey are important for this putative protective function. Here, we tested the effects of both iridescence and surface gloss (i.e. specular reflection) on the attack behaviour of prey-naïve avian predators. Using real and artificial jewel beetle,

Indexed as

aposematismGallus gallus domesticusglossiridescencepredationprotective colorationspecular reflectionSternocera aequisignata

Identifiers

PMID37649469
PMCPMC10462570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.