Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649337›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Determinants of acute irreversible electroporation lesion characteristics after pulsed field ablation: the role of voltage, contact, and adipose interference.

Alessio Gasperetti, Fabrizio Assis, Hemantkumar Tripathi, Masahito Suzuki, Akhilesh Gonuguntla, Rushil Shah, James Sampognaro, Marco Schiavone, Parag Karmarkar, Harikrishna Tandri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Termination of atrial arrhythmia and restoration of sinus rhythm during pulsed field ablation with a pentaspline catheter in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Acute incomplete pulmonary vein isolation and unintended posterior wall ablation during pulsed field ablation: insights from high-density mapping.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Evaluation of pulsed field ablation lesion characteristics using an in vitro vegetable model.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  5. Impact of catheter design on lesion dimensions during focal-bipolar pulsed field ablation: an in vitro potato model study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Incidence and predictors of AF recurrence during long-term follow-up of patients after PF ablation for atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: insight from the ATHENA registrys.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A day off to admIRE: same-day discharge after pulsed field ablation with a Variable-loop circular catheter.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Assessment of temperature dynamics in pulsed field ablation with a variable-loop circular catheter: a comparative analysis of waveform configurations and irrigation rates in specimens of bovine ventricular myocardium.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Another day in FARADISE? Lessons learned from a real-world global registry of pulsed field ablation with the pentaspline catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Pulsed field ablation for ventricular tachycardia: are we there yet?Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessio GasperettiDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3432-070X
Fabrizio AssisDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2605-0447
Hemantkumar TripathiDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Masahito SuzukiDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Akhilesh GonuguntlaDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0873-2217
Rushil ShahDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-0206
James SampognaroDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-1889
Marco SchiavoneDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-3380
Parag KarmarkarDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-5269
Harikrishna TandriDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-4352
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablative approach in which cardiomyocyte death is obtained through irreversible electroporation (IRE). Data correlating the biophysical characteristics of IRE and lesion characteristics are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different procedural parameters [voltage, number of cycles (NoCs), and contact] on lesion characteristics in a vegetal and animal model for IRE. METHODS AND

resultsTwo hundred and four Russet potatoes were used. Pulsed field ablation lesions were delivered on 3 cm cored potato specimens using a multi-electrode circular catheter with its dedicated IRE generator. Different voltage (from 300 to 1200 V) and NoC (from 1 to 5×) protocols were used. The impact of 0.5 and 1 mm catheter-to-specimen distances was tested. A swine animal model was then used to validate the results observed in the vegetable model. The association between voltage, the NoCs, distance, and lesion depth was assessed through linear regression. An almost perfect linear association between lesion depth and voltage was observed (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001). A similarly linear relationship was observed between the NoCs and the lesion depth (R2 = 0.73; P < 0.001). Compared with controls at full contact, a significant dampening on lesion depth was observed at 0.5 mm distance (1000 V 2×: 2.11 ± 0.12 vs. 0.36 ± 0.04, P < 0.001; 2.63 ± 0.10 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08, P < 0.001). No lesions were observed at 1.0 mm distance.

conclusionIn a vegetal and animal model for IRE assessment, PFA lesion characteristics were found to be strongly dependent on voltage settings and the NoCs, with a quasi-linear relationship. The lack of catheter contact was associated with a dampening in lesion depth.

Indexed as

AdiposityObesityAnimalsCathetersElectrodesElectroporationSwineContactIrreversible electroporationLesion characteristicsPulse field ablationVegetal modelsVoltage

Identifiers

PMID37649337
PMCPMC10485186
OpenAlexW4386305168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.