Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649331›Full record

ArticleHealth (London, England : 1997)2024

The contribution of a complex systems-based approach to progressive social resilience.

Philip Haynes, Angie Hart, Suna Eryigit-Madzwamuse, Matthew Wood, Josie Maitland, Josh Cameron

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health (London, England : 1997), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angie Hart
Suna Eryigit-Madzwamuse
Matthew WoodUniversity of Brighton, UK.
Josie MaitlandUniversity of Brighton, UK.
Josh CameronUniversity of Brighton, UK.
University of Brighton · GBUniversity of Chichester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of resilience in social practice has evolved from a theoretical framework at the intersection between individuals and their social ecology. Critics argue this theory still results in policies and practices that are too individualised, with the potential for negative social consequences. This paper further critiques contemporary understanding of resilience theory and its application. It juxtaposes complex systems theory with a social inequalities oriented resilience practice. This provides a paradoxical approach. It is acknowledged that state and public policy decisions and actions can be anti-resilient, undermining community and social resilience that already exists in the form of social relationships, self-organisation and co-production. Nevertheless, collective social resilience also illustrates the potential of local and service user organisations to contribute to an overall transformational change process.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalHumansPublic PolicySocioeconomic FactorsSystems Theorycomplex systemsresiliencesocial resilience

Identifiers

PMID37649331
PMCPMC11323425
OpenAlexW4386305497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.